This is an issue that I feel that the group needs to consider. At present, the FoDDC collect around 36000 tonnes per annum at kerbside [municipal waste], and there are separate arrangements [through trade collection and private collection agreements] for the collection and disposal of a smaller but indeterminate amount of the similar commercial / industrial fraction [ie. 'municipal waste like' commercial and industrial waste.]
Waste arisings of these domestic and domestic-like waste streams within FoDDC are probably over 60000 tonnes/annum when combined [using experience obtained elsewhere ], although hard to quantify exactly as the reporting arrangements for the commercial fraction are less stringent than those for the domestic fraction.
Collection arrangements are varied, but around 7500 tonnes per annum (estimated - assuming that all of the collected garden waste is composted) of this tonnage goes for green waste composting at a site near Dymock, and around 3700 tonnes of municipal waste [2005 figures] is recycled as 'dry recyclates'.
In 2005, FoDDC landfilled around 24300 tonnes of MSW, predominantly at Hempsted.
There is only one Materials Recycling Facility serving the district [Oak Quarry], and a number of bring-banks. Current infrastructure for the recycling / disposal of commercial wastes within FoDDC is mixed, but is largely reliant on skip operators with inert landfill [ie. Reeds of Mitcheldean, Bendalls of Lydney], and some smaller community scale groups [ie. Fairtide Centre in Lydney who recycle paper/card/foil etc.]
There are plans for future commercial infrastructure [ie. Waste Electronic Equipment plant at Cinderford] but little developed yet.
What all this adds up to is that :-
Most of the waste generated in the Dean leaves the area.
The environmental impact of local waste disposal does not appear to have been modelled in any detail [ie. using a green waste composting site at one end of the Forest is worse than using a number of smaller sites, which in turn is worse than composting this material at source.]
Incentives to increase recycling rates beyond the current level [and FoDDC are a year ahead of their target, so all kudos to them - but in reality their figures are artificially inflated as they have first created a waste stream in terms of collecting garden waste and then created a solution - it is arguable that this waste stream should not be created in the first place...] appear to have stalled - they need to look now at options for segregated collection of organic wastes, for example - and at new technologies (for the Dean anyway!) such as Anaerobic Digestion.
What can we do as a group? Dialogue with the District and County Council would be a start. Applying pressure to increase the number of Materials Reclamation Facilities would also help.
Any thoughts?